Fortellar

The audit is in 90 days. You need evidence, and a control set the auditor can follow.

We run audit readiness exactly how your audit will actually be conducted. We scope against your specific framework, test against standards like the NIST RMF and OIG's Seven Elements, and build policy and live evidence early to ensure you have a genuine audit period rather than a last-minute scramble.

Why This Matters

Audit failures rarely come from missing controls. They come from controls you can't prove you ran, and a program with no governance behind it.

Your auditor doesn't grade intent. They grade evidence. The gap between "we do that" and "here are six months of tickets, approvals, and logs that show we do that" is where findings come from, and where organizations burn through engineering quarters trying to reconstruct history.

We run audit readiness the way the audit will run: scoped against the framework, the auditor, and the customer obligation; tested against NIST RMF tasks and the OIG's Seven Elements; remediated with policy, control, and evidence built to the standard your auditor uses, and stood up early enough that the period is real, not assembled the week before.

What the auditor will ask for
01

Evidence period

Six months of tickets, approvals, and logs. Reconstructed after the fact reads as reconstructed.

02

Control ownership

A control that operates has an owner. The rest are sentences in a policy nobody runs.

03

Governance record

No forum and no cadence means no record of the decisions fieldwork will ask about.

04

Scope

The framework, the auditor, and the customer obligation each test something different.

Who this is for

Three situations where we start.

Situation 01

First audit on the calendar

A customer, investor, or regulator just made a framework non-negotiable. You have a date, a scope, and no defensible path to ready.

The outcomeA scoped framework map, a remediation plan, and an evidence base your auditor will actually accept.
Situation 02

Re-certification with new findings risk

You passed last year. New systems, new people, and a new auditor partner mean this year is not a copy-paste. Internal owners are already stretched.

The outcomeControls re-validated against the current environment and evidence rebuilt for the new period.
Situation 03

Cross-framework consolidation

You're running SOC 2 for customers, HIPAA for operations, and a state rule on top. Three teams, three binders, three versions of the same answer.

The outcomeOne control set mapped to every framework you report against, tested once, cited many times.

Want to see where your gaps are? Take the 15-minute readiness assessment →

What's included

Evidence in hand before the auditor asks for it.

A scoped framework map

Every control in your target framework mapped to the system, owner, and evidence type that satisfies it, cross-mapped to NIST RMF tasks and HITRUST CSF control categories so one map serves multiple audits.

A remediation plan you can execute

Gaps ranked by auditor impact, effort, and dependency. Your engineering team can staff it without guessing priority.

A live evidence base

Automated collection where systems support it, documented cadence where they don't. Evidence captured as it happens, not reconstructed before fieldwork.

Tested control narratives

Written the way your auditor reads them. Reviewed in mock sessions before the real one, so the first time you hear the question isn't the real one.

A trained program owner

Your internal lead knows the framework, the evidence, the auditor's logic, and how to chair the GRC forum after we hand off. We hand off a program, not a binder.

A pass-path to continuous compliance

The control set, evidence base, and forum we stand up here become the foundation for running GRC as a program, not repeating this sprint next year.

How it works

Two phases. Scope first, then implement, built around your audit window, not a standard engagement length.

Phase 01

Scope

We align to the exact framework, auditor, customer obligation, or regulator you're answering to. Categorization, control selection, and ownership are decided with your internal lead, not presented back to them. Cross-mapped against NIST RMF and HITRUST CSF so the work doesn't get redone next year.

You walk away with
  • A scoped, auditor-aligned control list with owners named.
  • A categorized risk profile and a control selection rationale on file.
Phase 02

Assess

We test the controls the way an auditor will. Interviews, artifact review, and walkthroughs on the systems that carry risk, not a questionnaire. Gaps are ranked by auditor visibility and remediation order.

You walk away with
  • A gap register with auditor-visible severity and a remediation priority order.
Phase 03

Implement

Real fixes. Policy rewritten to the current control environment, technical controls reconfigured where they fail, evidence collection stood up where it was missing, working-group ownership assigned where compliance was orphaned.

You walk away with
  • Controls closed, evidence flowing, program owners trained on the ongoing cadence.
Phase 04

Defend

We stay in the room. Mock audits, response drafts, and on-call support through fieldwork. Your team presents, we make sure they can.

You walk away with
  • A clean audit engagement, and a program ready to sustain past it.
Expertise this work draws on

The components behind a defensible audit.

Cybersecurity & Compliance

Compliance Framework Alignment

Control mapping across SOC 2, HITRUST CSF, HIPAA, PCI, NYDFS, ISO 27001, and NIST CSF, one environment, many frameworks, cross-mapped to NIST RMF tasks.

See expertise
Cybersecurity & Compliance

Evidence Automation

Continuous collection of artifact, log, ticket, and approval data. The period is captured as it happens, not reconstructed later.

See expertise
Technology & Security Operations

Logging & Audit Trails

Audit-grade logging across cloud, endpoint, and application estate, retained and searchable for the windows your framework requires.

See expertise
Cybersecurity & Compliance

Policy & Control Engineering

Policy written to the control environment you actually operate. Reviewed against auditor expectations before it goes into your program.

See expertise

The controls are probably real. The evidence is the problem.

Thirty minutes with a senior partner. Bring the framework and the date, we'll tell you what it takes to be ready.