Fortellar

Your cloud environment runs every day. Whether it's governed is a different question.

Cloud Security & Governance is the ongoing posture work. Identity boundaries, configuration baselines, network segmentation, policy enforcement, and the evidence pipeline that proves they hold. Across AWS, Azure, and GCP, against the framework your auditor reviews.

Why This Matters

Cloud configuration drifts every week. Without governance, you find out at audit time.

Cloud is software-defined infrastructure. Every commit and emergency change moves the security posture. The well-configured account from your last audit is not the account that will face your next one.

The work is making governance continuous: baselines that catch drift in hours, identity boundaries that hold up under privilege creep, and policy that runs in the pipeline instead of a PDF. We stand up the program once, then operate it on a cadence your auditor and your engineers can both live with.

Where the posture slips between audits
01

Config drift

Every commit and emergency change moves the baseline. Most drift is found at audit time.

02

Privilege creep

IAM roles accumulate. The identity boundary from last year isn't the one running now.

03

Segmentation

Network boundaries that don't survive the next architecture change.

04

Enforcement

Policy that lives in a PDF instead of running in the pipeline.

Who this is for

Three situations where the cloud has run ahead of the program.

Situation 01

Already in cloud, never governed it

The migration happened years ago, or last year, or in pieces. Speed was the priority. Security caught up partially. The accounts exist, the workloads run, and no one can answer with confidence whether the configuration today matches what the auditor will see next quarter.

The outcomeA current-state read on posture, a governance model installed, and continuous detection running before the audit window opens.
Situation 02

Cloud audit or customer review on the calendar

A customer just asked for cloud-specific evidence. An auditor expanded their scope. A new regulation reaches your cloud workloads in a way the prior cycle did not. The questions are specific, and 'we use AWS' is not the answer.

The outcomeCloud-specific evidence captured continuously, mapped to the framework, and ready to walk through with the auditor or customer.
Situation 03

Multiple teams, inconsistent posture

Different products on different clouds. Different engineering teams with different defaults. Different baselines, different logging, different evidence stories. Three answers to the same security question depending on who you ask.

The outcomeOne governance model applied across teams and clouds, with the per-environment differences documented as decisions, not gaps.
What's included

Cloud governance that runs continuously, not once a year.

A governed account and tenant structure

Organizational units, accounts, subscriptions, and projects laid out for clear boundaries. Guardrails set at the org level, exceptions documented at the workload level, ownership named for each.

An identity baseline that holds up

Federation, role hierarchies, machine identities, break-glass paths, and secrets management. The least-privilege architecture an auditor will accept and an engineering team will keep using.

Configuration baselines with drift detection

Baselines for every service that matters, mapped to CIS or NIST benchmarks. Drift events caught in hours. Exceptions logged with rationale, not absorbed into the baseline silently.

Network policy enforcement

Segmentation between tiers, egress controls, private connectivity to managed services, and the inspection points for your SOC. Reviewed against the next architecture change, not the last one.

Policy as code in the pipeline

Guardrails enforced at deploy time, not at audit time. The non-compliant configuration fails the build. Policies version-controlled, reviewed, and tested like the code they govern.

A compliance evidence pipeline

Automated capture from cloud APIs where possible, scheduled cadence where not. Evidence mapped to the controls in the framework you report against, in a single repository the auditor can walk.

A posture dashboard the CISO reads

Drift rate, exception trend, identity sprawl, framework coverage, top findings by severity. A weekly view the security team uses and a monthly view the executive can present.

A handoff into ongoing operations

Whatever we stand up runs after we step back. Your team, your managed service, or our Managed Security Services. Same control set, same evidence base, same governance model.

How it works

Four phases. Scoped to the cloud footprint and the framework you report against, not to a standard engagement length.

Phase 01

Assess

Current posture read across the six pillars. Configuration drift sampled against CIS or NIST baselines. Identity audited for sprawl and over-privilege. Logging coverage tested against your SOC's actual detections. Compliance evidence checked against the controls your auditor cites.

You walk away with
  • A current-state report across the six governance pillars.
  • A gap register with severity, owner, and dependencies.
  • A roadmap sized to your cloud footprint and audit cadence.
Phase 02

Design

The governance model written for your environment. Account structure, identity baseline, configuration baselines, network policy, pipeline guardrails, logging pipeline, and evidence mapping decided with engineering and signed by the security executive.

You walk away with
  • A governance model document, signed by engineering and security.
  • Baselines selected and tailored against CIS or NIST.
  • A control-to-evidence map for every framework you report against.
Phase 03

Implement

Baselines deployed. Drift detection live. Policy as code in the pipeline. Logging wired into the SOC. Identity reviewed and remediated. Evidence pipeline capturing the first quarter against the live controls, not against a reconstructed history.

You walk away with
  • Continuous drift detection operating across the cloud footprint.
  • Policy-as-code guardrails enforced at deploy time.
  • A live evidence pipeline mapped to your framework.
Phase 04

Operate

Ongoing cadence. Weekly drift review, monthly posture report, quarterly framework review, annual baseline refresh against updated guidance. Findings closed in the same forum that governs the rest of the security program.

You walk away with
  • An operations runbook for cloud governance.
  • A handoff to your team, your managed service, or Fortellar Managed Security.
  • A scheduled cadence aligned to your audit and board reporting windows.
Expertise this work draws on

The components behind a defensible cloud posture.

Cloud & Technology Infrastructure

Cloud Security Posture Management

Continuous configuration assessment across AWS, Azure, and GCP. The drift detection that catches the change your engineering team made on a Friday, before it becomes the finding on Monday.

See expertise
Cybersecurity & Compliance

Identity & Access Management

Federation, role design, privileged access, machine identities, and secrets management. The layer that absorbs the largest share of cloud incidents and the largest share of audit attention.

See expertise
Technology & Security Operations

Logging & Audit Trails

Audit-grade logging across cloud control plane, workload, and application layers. Retained and searchable for the windows your framework requires, tuned to the detections your SOC actually uses.

See expertise
Cybersecurity & Compliance

Compliance Framework Alignment

Control inheritance from the provider's attestations, then the controls you operate on top, cross-mapped to SOC 2, HITRUST, HIPAA, PCI, and NYDFS in one evidence base.

See expertise

The configuration that passed last year is not the configuration the auditor will see this year.

Thirty minutes with a senior partner. Bring the cloud provider, the framework you report against, and the next audit date. We will tell you what governance has to be running by then.